There are several tall covariates, but not, so we synopsis the complete outcomes right here (to have info, find Table 5 )
Consequence of standard linear mixed effects design forecasting and this sensed characteristics of the target female influenced objectification recommendations playing with Types of III ANOVA.
Note: For every single model simply provided details into highest quantity of advantages from the Possibilities Ratio Shot ( Desk 4 ). Facts have been reviewed by themselves due to the fact for each new member answered a different sort of subset off questions regarding an alternate subset from target female, and hence products cannot be joint in order to create total indices away from for every make.
Patiency
As Table 5 shows, the sex of the participant significantly influenced all four items of target women’s mental and moral patiency attribution. Target women perceived as open to casual sex were rated by male and female participants as less capable of feeling fear or pain (Fear: ? = -0.33, SE = .07; Pain: ? = -0.23, SE = .06). In addition, results show that as a target woman’s perceived intent to pursue casual sex increased, male and female participants cared less about someone taking advantage of her or manipulating her themselves (Take Advantage: ? = -0.40, SE = .10; Manipulate: ? = -0.30, SE = .07). For both male and female participants, a target woman’s attractiveness was positively related to her perceived ability to feel pain but not her ability to feel fear (Pain: ? = 0.09, SE = .03). Both male and female participants also cared more about someone taking advantage of a target woman if she was more attractive, but attractiveness did not affect how bad participants felt to manipulate a target woman themselves (Take Advantage: ? = 0.15, SE = .05). Fortsätt läsa ”There are several tall covariates, but not, so we synopsis the complete outcomes right here (to have info, find Table 5 )”