How many of these potentially polyandrous unions were truly polyandrous? An informed clue arises from exclusive subscription build in Mende Pattu. Table dos shows that one fourth of possibly polyandrous sibling communities within this district was actually inserted therefore. We do not even understand whether or not they had been consistent within notation along the section. Actually, among the first dos,five-hundred (regarding 10,076 joined people), maybe not one polyandrous union try registered, though there was basically enough prospective of them. Whenever we ignore those people very first dos,500 facts, brand new display regarding joined polyandrous brothers goes up in order to thirty two%. The fresh new Mende thombos together with describe one, in fact, fraternal polyandry out of one or two brothers was the fresh new principal pattern. In just that case from 102, we discover three brothers discussing a partner. However, other than 102 cousin cases, we find nine cases of cousins or other kin combos. This simply means one 8.0% from adult men and you may 5.5% of adult female lived-in some sort of polyandry within area. 6% (N = dos,094) and you can seven.2% (Letter = step 1,528). Some puzzling ’s the discussing regarding brothers-in-rules otherwise sons-in-legislation of one’s lead revealing a wife. We have not provided all of them about table, even as we have no idea whether or not they was brothers to every most other.
We do not know as to why the brand new thombo authorities in this region chose to check in polyandry, thus giving some kind of validity so you’re able to a romance you to contravened every Dutch rules
The first thombo membership during the Galle also offers another type of opportunity to imagine polyandry of the looking at mature brothers actually discussing a home. Desk 2 means that half of this new possibly polyandrous brothers in Galle province for the 1695/6 existed to one another in the same dwelling. This new Galle thombos also – exclusively – explore attendance out of children at the Protestant universities. Footnote 65 When we examine college attendance off youngsters away from household that have polyandrous unions to the people as opposed to eg unions we come across zero difference: 17% of boys visited university during the non-polyandrous family members (N = step 1,630 boys), and now have 17% from boys in polyandrous household (Letter = 166). The brand new figures toward girls try, respectively eight% (Letter = 1,241) and you may six% (Letter = 98). Footnote 66 We could finish you to definitely polyandry didn’t preclude baptism nor college attendance, and this, however, the schoolmasters failed to reject students away from ‘immoral’ families.
Footnote 64 Whenever we dispose of the first 2,500 facts instead proof of polyandry, i reach respectively ten
So what does all of this tell us towards overall chance out-of polyandry? We are able to securely assume that about 25 % in order to half of all of the probably polyandrous brothers was indeed actually surviving in an effective polyandrous relationship. We could now proceed to a beneficial recalculation regarding Dining table dos. For the Galle for the 1695/6 probably polyandrous unions would be used in twenty two.6% from nearest and dearest communities. So it payment will be recalculated as actually polyandrous unions from inside the 5.7–eleven.3% out of family groups (25–50% of twenty two.6). During the Mende inside the 1760 we already fully know it is eleven.3% (or 18% in case the earliest 2,500 ideas try discounted); inside the Udugaha in the 1760 it’s less than fifteen–30%, and in Negombo it is merely dos.7–5.3%. Ergo, from inside the Dutch several months, polyandry are quite common about Lowlands, especially in this new outlying elements bordering into the Kandy. But it is yes less common about instantaneous coastal regions that was lower than colonial dictate the new longest. We can pick this regarding vent out of Negombo obviously, plus regarding Galle area. Here, 7.6% out-of families traditions close to the fresh shore (N = 237) consisted of polyandrous unions versus 12.1% away from group about interior communities (= 576). That it, however, does not always indicate this is a bearing out of colonial policy or cultural influence. Seaside organizations was will involved with different occupations, compared with the fresh hinterlands in which subsistence farming try commonplace. Moreover, otherwise subsequently, (caste) demographics had been other such countries too. They are both you can easily indicators that different ways of lifestyle have been currently establish anywhere between littoral and inland populations having an extended duration of time, Footnote 67 and extra introduce one polyandry are mostly establish amongst farming group.